Interstate Commerce: what to anticipate in 2021

The cannabis industry continues to flourish as an business that is essential a particularly challenging period of economic struggle. The near-future possibility of states entering interstate compacts is emerging in 2021, as more conversations focus on the push for legalization. This shift that is potential the industry will allow legal importing and exporting of cannabis across state lines and could mean big things for the industry. While we likely won’t see interstate compact deals popping up right away, the moves made across the industry in 2021 will be vitally important to interstate commerce in the future that is imminent

Smart industry leaders will be looking at development through the lens of hubs—large grow facilities that ultimately will give retail operations across state lines from a vertically incorporated or standpoint that is wholesale. From a standpoint that is vertically integrated situated growing hubs allows cannabis organizations to produce shops and build nationwide brands. These hubs will be able to supply dispensaries across the country from a wholesale perspective. Establishing networking hubs will become key for setting up a transition that is successful interstate business.


Industry people, think long haul! Strategically visualizing locations of hubs for grows and dispensaries with regards to trucking that is accessible will be essential when preparing businesses for long-term success. Midwest states could see a rush that is huge cannabis manufacturing because of their proximity to easy to get at trucking routes.

Investors, don’t obsess on the schedule. There isn’t any crystal ball in terms of federal and state laws. Focus less on when interstate business will probably take place and much more on understanding it will happen. Organizations contemplating long-lasting development, hubs, and commerce that is interstate no doubt the future of the industry. Consider investing in companies that are fully aware of this shift and plans that are making the long run. Concentrating your attention on organizations which can be “built to final,” in contrast to being “built to flip,” will bolster your investment profile into the run that is long

Conglomeration and commercialization prevention

Once states are allowed to engage in interstate commerce (again, when, not if), the risks for further conglomeration and commercialization of the cannabis industry starkly present themselves. To avoid such abrupt economic challenges, it is participating that is crucial stay proactive in preventing little cannabis companies from being overpowered by bigger organizations which will gain access to a number of interstate business trucking channels. Tiny cannabis organizations are already coping with worries to be overpowered as big, multistate companies are creating store.

As states continue steadily to change their legalization status, this may continue steadily to take place. The arrival of interstate compact discounts between neighboring states potentially could suggest the conclusion of this line for most little, localized operators. Issue of effective legislation procedures and requirements continues to arise as states move toward legalization and commerce that is interstate to prevent instances like these from developing. Of course, only time will tell what the situation actually will look like as the movement persists.

It is no surprise the main risk of erasing state lines for imports and exports centers around the ability to distribute quality products. For example, major hubs producing lower-quality cannabis across the country may become staples for exporting due to the amount that is large of produced. In change, lower-quality cannabis could possibly be distributed to unhappy clients, showcasing just one more element become addressed. Genuine fear simmers in this area—new trucking that is largely accessible lead to the possibility substandard weed from one state could find its way into another state all the way across the country if proper measures are not implemented.

Pricing challenges have the potential to surface as well. Pricing is controlled by demand and supply, therefore if the supply in a single state is low even though the need is high, customers could possibly be gouged by out-of-state companies increasing their rates. Plus, each state places a unique group of regulations set up, and these laws and regulations might have a impact that is significant the growth, manufacturing, and sale of cannabis. Without the creation of a marketplace that is national quality, supply, and rates challenges inevitably will creep up as interstate business catches on.

States to view

But why would states wish to enter such pacts? In accordance with Alliance for Sensible areas creator Adam Smith, starting an industry for interstate business would “see valuations for numerous of farms and companies increased by multiples, that may spur an wave that is immediate of expansion and job creation.” Smith and other proponents argue legalizing commerce that is interstate cannabis means consumer states will be able to get their legal cannabis industries up and running sooner, “spurring an immediate wave of investment, business formation, and tens of thousands of jobs just when the states need them.” But deals that are such spell trouble for states still holding out on legalization. Consider Pennsylvania as an example. The cannabis grown in the Keystone State, which is legal for medical use, likely will be shipped out to neighboring recreationally legal states with New Jersey recently voting to legalize recreational use, if Pennsylvania doesn’t get on board with recreational sales. That will reject Pennsylvania tax that is valuable.

Predictions highlight mature markets like the West Coast and Pacific Northwest can begin entering commerce that is interstate within two to 36 months. There might be a sense that is heightened of with the recent U.S. Senate races in Georgia. Democrats taking control of the Senate with a split that is 50-50 a better chance for cannabis banking reform and legalization, which may spur conversations around compacts. The discussion continues throughout the map from western to eastern, like the Rocky that is western Mountain between Colorado and Arizona and around the East Coast states of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, and Massachusetts. The Pacific Northwest already is heavily connected by legalization and primed to be an leader that is initial interstate business tasks. As a result of nationwide trucking routes, Midwest states like Missouri, Illinois, and Michigan are regarding the radar of several investors. Each is viable contenders for moving the cannabis industry into a lucrative market that is national favorably for producers, consumers, and investors alike.

Opportunity for a presence that is national*)Much work needs to be done and lots of conversations must deal with interstate cannabis business. Strategic placement of hubs along with trucking that is accessible will unlock myriad opportunities for years to come.

Once states are authorized to move into interstate commerce compacts, massive opportunities for solidifying a truly ubiquitous presence that is national occur. Inspite of the development of cannabis organizations nationwide, the industry remains largely fractured. In reality, few organizations have the ability to deliver their brand name outside state lines, resulting in inconsistent branding and messaging from state to mention. The work of playing interstate business brings the chance to solidify their existence on a stage that is national. It’s an opportunity to become a Nike or Coors of the cannabis world.

Peter Marcus


is communications director for Terrapin, a company that is national origins in Boulder, Colorado. Ahead of Terrapin that is joining served as senior statehouse reporter for the Colorado Springs Gazette and The Washington Post twice named Marcus one of the top state-based political and reporters that are legislative the world.

Latest posts